That we have reached a moment in American professional sports when a fan can sit on the stands in a game and bet on anything, not only to the winner and the loser, but the next release or the next basket, is undeniable. 스포츠배팅 The merits of that reality can be debated. But put aside the moral arguments aside, and consider a different question: is the sports relationship with the game evolved to the point where the professional leagues will make the decisions about what is best for ... the players?
This seems inconceivable: until he heard Rob Manfred, the commissioner of Major League Baseball, relay the story of a phone call he received from Adam Silver, the counterpart of him with the NBA.
"He said: 'Rob, you have to stop talking about the rhythm of the game because your rhythm of the game is going to be absolutely perfect for 해외스포츠배팅," Manfred said on Tuesday at a web seminar hosted by the Sportic sports website. "And he's right, he's usually. And he was right about it."
Since sports betting has gone from Sketchy and in the shadows to ubiquitous and in a wide daylight, Manfred's anecdote could seem less as an admission and more like the normal business course. But it should serve as a needle warning through the record about what is happening to the naked eye: the professional leagues will not only allow and encourage gambling in their games, but will be willing to bend their products to adapt to Players and coaches and fans. But people whose main interest is betting on procedures. Not merely at the beginning of the competition. But at the moment, between the works.
As legal askens, journalists jump from sports page at Sportsbook
That's embarrassing. One thing is to take advantage of the habits that already exist, and given that the American Association of Game estimates that 52.3 million Americans bet almost $ 21.5 billion in sports in 2020, those habits are very widespread. But it is a completely different effort to start configuring your product to the unaware tastes of the team supporters, but of the players looking for a better bet.
This does not mean that MLB does not see the rhythm and duration of your games as a problem. He has, and he does it. But Manfred's words also show how the leagues could mold problems to opportunities if there is a possibility of new income. Given the AGA projected in 2018 that legalized sports betting could bring only $ 1.1 billion to MLB, any fanatical should read the commissioners' statements about betting, not as attractive, but as another form of Slide your hands in your pockets.
This would have been true at any time. It is particularly relevant now, with baseball states and sands were filled only at a partial capacity after a year with zero fans who generate zero dollars in person due to the coronavirus pandemic.
This is also a month when the NFL announced its new television offers, for a total of more than $ 110 billion, and Commissioner Roger Goodell said: "We find ways we can involve fanatics through legalized sports betting" . On the same day, Manfred said Sportico his silver history, the NHL announced his media agreement with Turner Sports, who will surely include something similar to what the network already offers the NBA viewers through the TNT bets, a Live transmission transmission that is not found in a game strategy, but in the probabilities of the game. This is a long way since 1991, when David Stern, then the Commissioner of the NBA, declared before a Congress Committee that "the interstate ramifications of sports betting are a convincing reason for federal legislation." The law that resulted, the Law of Professional Protective and Amateur (PASP), effectively banned sports betting in all states, but Nevada.
It fits the thought that came out with subsequent generations, back to the World Series of 1919, thrown by eight members of the Chicago White Sox. It fits the thought behind the destination of Pete Rose of Baseball; The leader of the hits of all time is not yet allowed in the ballot that is in the Hall of Fame. He adjusted to the thought that followed the college basketball shaving scandals: the sports game could corrode the integrity of the competition, and without the integrity of the competition, with what do you have? Professional fight?
That is outdated thinking, as well as the prohibition of alcohol is outdated thinking. There is more sense in legalization and regulation than to sweep these habits under the carpet. People are going to drink beer, and people are going to bet on sports. Let's go outdoors and make sure it is done correctly.
In 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States hit PASPA, and the money has fluent. From 21 states and D.C. They have legalized sports betting, according to the AGA.
Everything that makes sense because some of the concerns of past generations no longer apply. When The Black Sox launched the World Series a century ago, the conspirators stayed with more money under the table of what they would have to win the championship. Since the average salary of MLB in 2020 would have been almost $ 3.9 million (if the season had not been shortened by the pandemic), it is more difficult to imagine than to encourage PRO players to fix the games.
But see a live sporting event or listen to the sports conversation radio these days. The torrent of the game content and advertising is relentless. The leagues of the same institutions once distanced themselves from: Casinos, daily betting sites, are so intertwined in the business to be indistinguishable. Everything lets everything wonder if the purpose of these games is rooting, root, root for the housing equipment or to convert $ 20 at $ 100. 알트벳 주소
Golf bet big in the legalized sports game. It's coming out
There are wonderful questions here, and go directly to the kernel of why we like sports to start. Do we want the point of entry how convincing the competition is and how hypnotizing the athletes are? Or do we want it if we could make a couple of quick dollars about whether a ball bounces through the net or off the edge?
At its best, sports build communities of people who are excited about the presentation of the same sand and encourage themselves for the same shirt, singing and singing on the road. These communities share the same heroes and goats, the same pain of past losses, the same hope on what could happen below. They are unified
Put those communities on those same sands, but give them divergent financial interests: the type in section 101 is reversed in the next mass producing a success; The boy in section 202 put the money from him behind an exit, and what remains is glorified Keno. It is not morally corrupt or ethically repellent, exactly, but it is also more difficult to describe a bingo card as a civic trust.
댓글
댓글 쓰기